铸态40CrNiMo合金钢Johnson-Cook本构模型及对比分析

    Johnson-Cook Constitutive Model of As-cast 40CrNiMo Alloy Steel and Contrastive Analysis

    • 摘要: 以铸锻联合成形工艺为研究背景,采用金属模真空铸造方式获得了铸态40CrNiMo合金钢,利用Gleeble-3800热模拟试验机对其进行等温压缩实验,变形温度800~1100℃、应变速率0.001~10 s-1。根据实验数据绘制铸态40CrNiMo合金钢的真实应力-应变曲线,发现在低变形温度或高应变速率变形条件下,真实应力-应变曲线呈典型的动态回复型,随着成形温度的升高或应变速率的降低,真实应力-应变曲线逐渐向动态再结晶型转变。构建了铸态40CrNiMo合金钢的Johnson-Cook本构模型,对应变速率敏感参数进行了修正,发现该模型在低变形温度、高应变速率的适用性较好。在适用条件下构建了铸态40CrNiMo合金钢的Johnson-Cook本构模型,并与Arrhenius本构模型进行对比分析。结果表明,整体上Johnson-Cook本构模型的预测精度高于Arrhenius本构模型的,但在变形温度900℃、应变速率10 s-1的条件下,Arrhenius本构模型的预测精度略高于Johnson-Cook本构模型的。

       

      Abstract: Based on the research background of casting-forging combined forming process, as-cast 40CrNiMo alloy steel was obtained by vacuum casting by using metal mold. The isothermal compression tests of as-cast 40CrNiMo are implemented on a Gleeble-3800 thermal simulated test machine under deformation temperature of 800-1100 ℃, with strain rate of 0.001-10 s-1.The true stress-strain curves of the as-cast 40CrNiMo alloy steel were plotted according to the experimental data. The results show that the true stress-true strain curves present typical dynamic recovery type under low deformation temperature or high strain rate; with the deformation temperature increasing or the strain rate decreasing, the true stress-strain curves gradually transform to the dynamic recrystallization type. Johnson-Cook constitutive model of as-cast 40CrNiMo alloy steel is constructed and the strain rate sensitivity parameter is modified. The results show that the model has good applicability at low temperature and high strain rate. So the Johnson-Cook constitutive model of as-cast 40CrNiMo alloy steel is constructed under applicable conditions and compared with the Arrhenius constitutive model. On the whole, the prediction accuracy of the Johnson-Cook constitutive model is better than that of the Arrhenius constitutive model, but under the condition of deformation temperature 900 ℃ and strain rate 10 s-1, the prediction accuracy of the Arrhenius constitutive model is slightly better than that of the Johnson-Cook constitutive model.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回