316LN不锈钢厚板多层多道焊接热源模型的开发与测试

    Development and Test of Heat Source Model for 316LN Stainless Steel Plate Multi-pass Welding

    • 摘要: 在大型结构件的多层多道焊接模拟仿真中,焊接热源模型的计算效率与计算精度是工程上主要考虑的问题。本研究基于ABAQUS有限元计算平台,利用316LN不锈钢厚板模型,通过Fortran语言子程序以及Python语言的二次开发分别实现3种焊接热源模型的加载,分别为双椭球热源模型(DEHS)、瞬间热源模型(IHS)和移动单元体热源模型(MBHS),从温度分布、焊接残余应力场和焊接变形的角度分析各个热源模型的准确性,并结合计算所花费的时间综合判断热源模型的优缺点。仿真结果表明:IHS模型虽然计算效率极高,但计算精度较差,难以单独应用在多层多道焊仿真计算中;MBHS模型与DEHS模型相比,其温度场、残余应力场差别很小,焊接变形的差异在数值上为7.2%,但MBHS模型所花费的计算时间仅为DEHS模型的37.5%。因此,MBHS模型的计算效率更高,在解决工程问题时是一种可以较好取代DEHS模型的热源模型。

       

      Abstract: In engineering, the efficiency and accuracy of the welding heat source model are crucial considerations in the multi-layer and multi-pass welding simulation of large structural parts. In this study, a 316 LN stainless steel plate model was used in ABAQUS finite element calculation platform. The secondary development of Fortran subprogram and Python was used to fulfill the load of three welding heat source models, namely, double ellipsoidal heat source model(DEHS),instantaneous heat source model(IHS) and moving body-element heat source(MBHS). The accuracy of each heat source model was analyzed by examining the temperature field distribution, welding residual stress field and welding deformation.The advantages and disadvantages of the heat source model were assessed by considering the time spent on calculation. The simulation results indicate that while the IHS model has high calculation efficiency, its accuracy is poor, and it is not suitable for using alone in multi-layer and multi-pass welding simulation calculation. Compared with the DEHS model, the MBHS model has little difference on the temperature field and residual stress field, and the welding deformation difference is only7.2%, while the calculation time of the MBHS model is only 37.5% of that of the DEHS model. Therefore, the MBHS model is a suitable engineering heat source model, which can replace the DEHS model effectively.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回